DOI: https://doi.org/10.33099/2311-7249/2019-36-3-135-140

Application of modified equations of dynamics of average for operational forecasting of the turn and results of battle action

Borys Butvin, Olexander Mashkin, Olexii Solomitskii

Abstract


The article discusses the peculiarities of evaluation of quality of models and multimodel complexes of operations (combat actions). Such models are an effective and necessary tool for operational calculations at operational training activities, and procedures for assessing their qualitative properties are an important and responsible phase of the life cycle. In theoretical qualifiers the direct and reverse tasks of quality assessment are distinguished, the first is based on the direct quality measurement, the second is the quality management of the product to give it the necessary properties. The reverse task becomes especially relevant for multimodel complexes of operations (combat actions), which are initially built with a flexible structure, which includes the possibility of adding new models or modifying existing ones. Since the concept of quality includes both objective properties and subjective assessments of the utility of an object, which are evaluated by a single generic indicator with a qualifying method, it is natural to involve experts in the subject area in such assessments. The development of an expert information processing unit, together with modern software tools for data analysis and processing, provides an opportunity to organize the process of quality assessment of the most important properties of models and multimodel complexes. This is possible by establishing a non-linear analytical dependency that links independent variables (processed expert estimates) to a dependent variable, which is an integral quality assessment of models. The example of such a dependency with a high determinative factor of integrated quality assessment, as discussed in the article, confirmed the usefulness of such an approach. Having the described quality assessment tool will allow to calculate the integral quality indicator of selected model properties with a high accuracy, as well as can be used for qualifying analysis of possible modifications and structural changes in models and multimodel complexes of operations (combat actions).

Keywords


model qualification; polymodel complex of operations; qualitative assessment of properties

References


1. Mikoni S.V., Sokolov B.V., Yusupov R.M. (2018), Qualimetry of the models and polymodel complexes: monograph. [Kvalimetriya modeley i polimodel’nykh kompleksov: monografiya], RAS, Moscow, 314 p.

2. Pyatak I.A. (2012), Metrology, standardization, certification and accreditation. [Metrologiya, standartizatsiya, sertifikatsiya i akkreditatsiya], DNU, Dnepropetrovsk, 26 p.

3. Sokolov B.V., Yusupov R.M. (2004), Conceptual and methodical bases of the model and polymodel complexes qualification metering. [Kontseptual’nyye i metodicheskiye osnovy kvalimetrii modeley i polimodel’nykh kompleksov], Proceedings of the Saint-Petersburg Institute of Informatics and Automation of the Russian Academy of Sciences, SPIIRAN, Saint-Petersburg, Issue 2. Т. 1. pp. 10–34.

4. Okhtilev M.Yu., Pavlov A.N., Plotnikov A.M., Potryasaev S.A., Sokolov B.V., Yusupov R.M. (2015), Complex modeling of complex objects: main features and examples of practical implementation. [Kompleksnoye modelirovaniye slozhnykh ob’’yektov: osnovnyye osobennosti i primery prakticheskiy realizatsii], Simulation modeling: Theory and practice (IMMOD-2015): plenary reports of the 7th scientific-practical conf. on imitation modeling and its application in science and industry, NOVIM, Moscow, рр. 58–81.

5. Kulayichev A.P. (2002), Data analysis methods and tools in Windows environment. STADIA. [Metody i sredstva analiza dannykh v srede Windows. STADIA], Informatics and Computers, Moscow, 341 p.

6. Zagorka O.M., Mosov S.P., Sbitnev A.I., Stizhuk P.I. (2005), Elementary research of the complex military systems: textbook. [Elementy doslidzhennya skladnykh system viys’kovoho pryznachennya: posibnyk], NADU, Kiev, 72 p


GOST Style Citations


1. Микони С.В. Квалиметрия моделей и полимодельных комплексов: монографія / С.В. Микони, Б.В. Соколов, Р.М. Юсупов.М.: РАН, 2018. – 314 с.

2. Пятак И.А. Метрология, стандартизация, сертификация и аккредитация. – Д.: ДНУ, 2012. – 26 с.

3. Соколов Б.В. Концептуальные и методические основы квалиметрии моделей и полимодельных комплексов / Б.В. Соколов, Р.М. Юсупов // Труды Санкт-Петербургского института информатики и автоматизации РАН. – Санкт-Петербург: СПИИРАН, 2004. – Вып. 2. Т. 1. – С.10–34.

4. Охтилев М. Ю. Комплексное моделирование сложных объектов: основные особенности и примеры практической реализации / М.Ю. Охтилев , А.Н. Павлов , А.М. Плотников, С.А. Потрясаев, Б.В. Соколов, Р.М. Юсупов // Имитационное моделирование: Теория и практика (ИММОД-2015): пленарные доклады 7-ой науч.-практ. конф. по имитац. моделир. и его применению в науке и промышленности. – М.: НОИМ, 2015. – С. 58–81.

5. Кулаичев А.П. Методы и средства анализа данных в среде Windows. STADIA. – М.: Информатика и компьютеры, 2002. – 341с.

6. Загорка О.М. Елементи дослідження складних систем військового призначення: посібник / О.М. Загорка , С.П. Мосов, А.І. Сбитнєв., П.І. Стужук. – К.: НАОУ, 2005. – 72 c.





ISSN 2410-7336 (Online)

ISSN 2311-7249 (Print)