STATE OF THE ART AND PROBLEMS OF DEFEAT OF LOW, SLOW AND SMALL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES

Authors

  • Anatolii S. Dudush Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University, Ukraine
  • Vladislav A. Tyutyunnik Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University,
  • Alexander A. Reznichenko Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University,
  • Spartak U. Hohoniants National defense university of Ukraine named after Ivan Cherniakhovski,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33099/2311-7249/2018-31-1-121-131

Keywords:

LSS UAV, classification, threats, advantages, weak sides, countermeasures.

Abstract

In the article considered one of the most intensive developing threat for civilian and military spheres – hostile use of Low, Slow and Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (LSS UAVs). The classification of the LSS UAVs is given. World tendencies of hostile use of LSS UAVs – attack and ISR – are considered. Three categories of existing threats of using LSS UAVs are distinguished. Special attention is paid to the third category of threats, the main feature of which is a high level of training of the operator that can independently assemble Plug and Fly model using COTS or military technologies and finalizing its hardware and software tools for specific tasks. Main advantages and weak sides of LSS UAVs is distinguished. Determined that the best strategy is therefore to employ a hierarchy of countermeasures including regulatory (prevention, deterrence, denial), passive (detection and interruption) and active countermeasures (destruction). State of the art and current problems of possible countermeasures is analyzed. The most promising LSS UAVs` defeat technologies is described. Most attention is paid to specialized sensors and modern active defeat means such as programmable air burst munition (PABM) and high energy laser (HEL) systems.

References

1. Commercial unmanned aerial vehicle market analysis – industry trends, companies and what you should know [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: http://www.businessinsider.com/commercial-uav-market-analysis-2017-8.2. Baker B. Small bombs, big effect: arming small UAVs with guided weapons [Електронний ресурс] / B. Baker // Air Force Technology. Режим доступу: https://www.airforce-technology.com.

3. Munday R. GBAD Sensor Mix Optimisation Study for Emerging Threats : Study Report / NATO Industrial Advisory Group (Study Group 188). – NATO, 2015. – 237 p.

4. Valavanis K. P. Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles / K. P. Valavanis, G. J. Vachtsevanos. –London: Springer, 2015. – 3022 p.

5. Floreano D. Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones / D. Floreano, R. J. Wood // Nature. – 2015. – Vol. 521. – p. 460–466.

6. Miasnikov, E. Threat of Terrorism Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Technical Aspects. [Study Report]. Moscow: Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 2005. 26 p.

7. Munday R. Engagement of Low, Slow and Small Aerial Targets by GBAD : Study Report / NATO Industrial Advisory Group (Study Group 170). – NATO, 2013. – 333 p.

8. Delivery drone [Електронний ресурс]. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Режим доступу: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delivery_drone.

9. UAV-related events [Електронний ресурс]. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Режим доступу: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UAV-related_events.

10. Small Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (drones) Mid-Air Collision Study : Study Report / Crown copyright.London, 2016. – 18 p.

11. Abbot C. Hostile Drones: the Hostile Use of Drones by Non-State Actors against British Targets : Study Report / Remote Control Project. –London, 2016. – 20 p.

12. Warrick J. Use of Weaponized Drones by ISIS Spurs Terrorism Fears [Електронний ресурс] / J. Warrick // The Washington post. Режим доступу: https://www.washingtonpost.com.

13. Non-State Actors with Drone Capabilities [Електронний ресурс]. World of Drones. Режим доступу: https://www.newamerica.org/in-depth/world-of-drones/5-non-state-actors-drone-capabilities/.

14. Sander A. Game of Drones ; Wargame Report / Centre for a New American Security. –Washington, 2016. – 23 p.

15. Unmanned Aerial System Threats: Exploring Security Implications and Mitigation Technologies ; Hearing Report /U.S. Government Publishing Office. –Washington, 2015. –46 p.

16. No Fly Zone Database as extracted 4/22/2017 from DJI Go4 apps [Електронний ресурс]. GitHub. Режим доступу: https://github.com/MAVProxyUser/dji.nfzdb/blob/master/dji.nfzdb.csv.

17. Wallace R. J. Examining Unmanned Aerial System Threats & Defenses: A Conceptual Analysis / R. J. Wallace, J. M. Loffi // International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace. – 2015. – Vol. 2(4). – P. 1–33.

18. Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) Annex Handbook – 2017 [Електронний ресурс].Brno: MTCR, 2017. – 352 p. Режим доступу: http://mtcr.info/wordpress/ wp-content/uploads/2017/10/MTCR-Handbook-2017-INDEXED-FINAL-Digital.pdf.

19. Ravich T. M. The Integration of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles into the National Airspace / T. M. Ravich // North Dakota Law Review. – 2009. – Vol. 85, No. 597. – P. 597–622.

20. Vishnevsky, S. Potential Capabilitys of Radiotechnical Troops Radars to Detect Operational-Tactical and Tactical

Unmanned Air Vehicle (in Ukrainian). Science and

Technology of the Air Force ofUkraine, 2017, Vol. 2, № 27, p. 92-98.

21. Harman S. A. Applications of Staring Surveillance Radars / Harman S. A., Hume A. L. // Proceedings of IEEE International Radar Conference. –ArlingtonVA:USA, 2015. – P. 270–273.

22. Hindle P. Drone Detection and Location Systems. [Електронний ресурс] / P. Hindle // Microwave journal, 2017. Режим доступу: http://www.microwavejournal. com/articles/28459-drone-detection-and-location-systems.

23. Sedyshev, Yu. and Dudush, A. Evaluation of the Impact of the Time Synchronization Accuracy of Multistatic Radar Positions on Errors in Determining the Spatial Coordinates of Aerial Objects. Radioelectronics and Communications Systems, 2013, vol. 56, no.4, p. 178-185.


24. Warnke H. W. Reconnaissance of LSS-UAS with Focus on EO-Sensors / H. W. Warnke // NATO Military Sensing STO Meeting Proceedings (STO-MP-SET-241). –Canada: STO, 2017. – P. 9-3-1–9-3-18.

25. Baker I. Detector and Camera Technologies for 3D Active Infrared Imaging /I. Baker, K. Storie // NATO Military Sensing RTO Meeting Proceedings (RTO-MP-SET-130). –Orlando: RTO, 2008. – P. 26-1–26-10.

26. Kerns A. J. Unmanned aircraft capture and control via GPS spoofing / A. J. Kerns, D. P. Shepard, J. A. Bhatti // Journal of Field Robotics. – 2014. – Vol. 31, № 4. – P. 617–636.

27. Oerlikon Ahead Air Burst Technology: Air Burst Munition (ABM) [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: http://en.calameo.com/books/ 005068186ce3abb3008f7.

28. Pudo D. High Energy Laser Weapon Systems: Evolution, Analysis and Perspectives / D. Pudo, J. Galuga // Canadian Military Journal. – 2017. – Vol. 17, № 3. – P. 53–60.


Published

2018-03-01

Issue

Section

Modern Military Theoretical Problems