A COMPLEXITY OF GOING IS NEAR EVALUATION OF EFFICIENCY OF FUNCTIONING THE COMMUNICATION NETWORKS ARE ON CORRESPONDING INDEXES OF QUALITY

Lev N. Sakovich, Vadim P. Romanenko, Sergey E. Gnatyuk, Igor Y. Rozum

Abstract


Improving the efficiency of communication systems in the modern conditions of their development is one of the most urgent scientific and practical problems. Particular attention is paid to the problem of quantifying the effectiveness of the functioning of these systems, and not on individual indicators, but in a complex way, taking into account the influence of all indicators of quality on the result of the system's intended use. The purpose of the publication is to formalize the process of comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of the communication system and to demonstrate, by way of example, the observance of the requirements for reliability and readiness, the opportunity to streamline its evaluation activities with the calculation of probabilistic quality indicators.
Evaluation of the efficiency of the communication system is a multi-criteria problem of determining the real state of various components of the quality of its functioning. The formalization of the complex estimation of efficiency is proposed, taking into account the influence on its value of separate quality indicators. Scientific novelty of the work consists in quantitative estimation of the value of the probabilistic indices of individual components and a comprehensive assessment of the quality of the functioning of the communication system in general. The results obtained should be used both in assessing the effectiveness of existing and well-founded choices for the development of promising communication systems.


Keywords


communication system; complex evaluation of the functioning of the system system

References


1. Оleynik V.F. Base teori of Communications. – Кiev: Techniques, 2000. – 152 с.

2. Edward Golan, Adam Kraśniewski, Janusz Romanik, Paweł Skarżyński, Robert Urban, “Experimental Performance Evaluationof the Narrowband VHF Tactical IP Radioin Test-Bed Environment”, Military Communications and Information Technology: A Trusted Cooperation Enabler, vol. 2, pp. 99-106, 2012.

3. United States. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). Joint Publication 6-0: Joint Communications System (2015, June 10). [Online]. Available: ttp:// www.dtic.mil/doctrine/new_pubs/jp6_0.pdf.

4. Defense Information Network (DISN) ARCHITECTURE. – DISA, Center for Systems Engineering. Version 1.2c, April 1998.

5. Signal battalion recognized for outstanding support, The Maple Leaf, 28 September 2007, Vol. 10, No. 6.

6. Zayceva Е.M. Researches of reliability of the informative systems / Е.M. Zayceva // Electro Communications. – 2003. – № 6. – С. 37-39.

7. Habarin А.V. About going near the decision of task of choice of methodology. / А.V. Habarin, О.M. Оdaruschenko // Radioelectronic end Computer System. – Harkiv: NAU “HАІ”. – 2006. – № 6 (18). – С. 61–70.

8. Goloman S.М. Base realiability Information System / S.М. Goloman, О.V. Коrneyko, О.S. Petrov, V.О. Horoshko, L.М. Schеrbak. – Lugansk: “Naulidg”, 2012. – 335с.

9. Volochiy B.Yu. System engineering design of telecommunication networks / B.Yu. Volochiy, L.D. Оzirovskiy. – Lvov: Lvovska politehnic, 2012. – 128 с.

10. Gnatyuk S.E. Показники reliability Sistem of Communications / S.E. Gnatyuk, L.N. Sakovich // Communications. – 2013. – № 5. – С. 8–12.

11. Yanliang Li, Rui Kang, Lin Ma, Lei Li. Application and improvement study on FMEA in the process of military equipment maintenance. 9th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety, 12-15 June 2011, Guiyang, China: Proc. IEEE, 2011, Vol. I, II, pp. 803–810. – DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/ICRMS.2011.5979402.

12. Robert Thomson, John Lynn. The benefits of using head mounted displays and wearable computers in a military maintenance environment. 2010 International Conference on Education and Management Technology (ICEMT), 2-4 November 2010, Cairo, Egypt: Proc. IEEE, 2010, pp. 560–564. – DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICEMT.2010.5657592.

13. Qiao Ma, Guibo Yu, Lijun Cao, Jinhui Zhao, Bing Feng. Decision-making model for ranking battlefield damaged equipment repairs based on multi-criteria. 2013 International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering (QR2MSE), 15-18 July 2013, Emeishan, Sichuan, China: Proc. IEEE, 2013, Vol. II, pp. 1942–1944. – DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/QR2MSE.2013. 6625959.

14. Haikuan Wang, Quan Shi, Fei Xiong, Kan Wang. The application of TOPSIS on sequencing decision-making in equipment battlefield repair. 2013 International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering (QR2MSE), 15-18 July 2013, Emeishan, Sichuan, China: Proc. IEEE, 2013, Vol. II, pp. 1574–1578. – DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/QR2MSE. 2013.6625876.

15. Chunliang Chen, Wenhua Shi, Shixin ZhangThe key operation ascertaining of armored equipment parts batch-repair progress for quality monitoring based on FCE. 2013 International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering (QR2MSE), 15-18 July 2013, Emeishan, Sichuan, China: Proc. IEEE, 2013. Vol. II, pp. 1542–1545. — DOI: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1109/QR2MSE.2013. 6625867.

16. Lenkov S.V, Zubarev V.V., Salimov R.M., Protsenko V.A. “Formalization of process of carrying out of repair of components of radio-electronic equipment”, Vіsnik Cherkaskogo derjavnogo tehnologіchnogo unіversitetu, pp. 20–22, 2009.

17. UddE. Application of Fiber Optic Smart Structures // Opt. and Photon News. – 1996. Vol. 7, № 5. – P. 17–22.

18. Senior J. M. Moss S.E., Cusworth S.D. Multiplexing Techniques for Noninterferometric Optical Point-Sensor Networks // Fiber and Integr. Opt. 1998. – Vol. 17, № 1. – P. 3–20.

19. Reliability Indicators Reliable Terms and definitions: DSTU 2860-94. – [Effective from 1 January 1995-01-01]. – K.: Gosstandart of Ukraine, 1995. – 90 p. – (National Standard of Ukraine).

20. Popovskiy V.V. Methods of a priori assessment of network reliability / V.V. Popovskiy, V.S. Volotka // Radiotechniques. – Harkov: HNUR, 2014. – Вип. № 178. – С. 20–23.

21. Rizchakov V.А. Quantitative assessment of structural reliability Sistem of Communications / V.А. Rizchakov, L.N. Sakovich // Communications. – 2004. – № 4. – С. 53–57.

22. Minochkin А.I. The management of the topology of the mobile radio network / А.I. Minochkin, V.A. Romanyuk // Communications. – 2003. – № 2. – С. 28–33.

Ventcel Е.S. The theory of probabilities. – M.: Higher school., 2002. – 275 с.

24. Sakovich L.N. Choice of measuring instruments for maintenance and current repair of equipment for information security systems / L.N. Sakovich, V.А. Rizchakov, V.P. Pavlov // Legal, normative and metrological provision of information security systems in Ukraine. – К. : NTUU “КPІ”, 2003. – V. № 7. – С. 77–85.


GOST Style Citations


1. Олійник В.Ф. Основи теорії систем зв’язку. – К: Техніка, 2000. – 152 с.

2. Edward Golan, Adam Kraśniewski, Janusz Romanik, Paweł Skarżyński, Robert Urban, “Experimental Performance Evaluationof the Narrowband VHF Tactical IP Radioin Test-Bed Environment”, Military Communications and Information Technology: A Trusted Cooperation Enabler, vol. 2, pp. 99-106, 2012.

3. United States. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). Joint Publication 6-0: Joint Communications System (2015, June 10). [Online]. Available: ttp://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/new_pubs/jp6_0.pdf.

4. Defense Information Network (DISN) ARCHITECTURE. – DISA, Center for Systems Engineering. Version 1.2c, April 1998.

5. Signal battalion recognized for outstanding support, The Maple Leaf, 28 September 2007, Vol. 10, No. 6.

6. Зайцева Е.Н. Исследования надежности информационных систем / Е.Н. Зайцева // Електросвязь. – 2003. – № 6. – С. 37–39.

7. Харыбин А.В. О подходе к решению задачи выбора методологии оценки структурной надежности и живучести информационных систем критического применения / А.В. Харыбин, О.Н. Одарущенко // Радіоелектронні і комп'ютерні системи. – Х. : НАУ “ХАІ”. – 2006. – № 6(18). – С. 61–70.

8. Головань С.М. Основи надійності інформаційних систем / С.М. Головань, О.В. Корнейко, О.С. Петров, В.О. Хорошко, Л.М. Щербак. – Луганськ : Вид-во “Наулідж”, 2012. – 335 с.

9. Волочій Б.Ю. Системотехнічне проектування телекомунікаційних мереж / Б.Ю. Волочій, Л.Д. Озіровський. – Львів : Вид-во Львівська політехніка, 2012. – 128 с.

10. Гнатюк С.Є. Показники надійності систем зв’язку / С.Є. Гнатюк, Л.М. Сакович // Зв'язок. – 2013. – № 5. – С. 8–12.

11. Yanliang Li, Rui Kang, Lin Ma, Lei Li. Application and improvement study on FMEA in the process of military equipment maintenance. 9th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety, 12-15 June 2011, Guiyang, China: Proc. IEEE, 2011, Vol. I, II, pp. 803–810. — DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICRMS.2011.5979402.

12. Robert Thomson, John Lynn. The benefits of using head mounted displays and wearable computers in a military maintenance environment. 2010 International Conference on Education and Management Technology (ICEMT), 2-4 November 2010, Cairo, Egypt: Proc. IEEE, 2010, pp. 560–564. — DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICEMT.2010.5657592.

13. Qiao Ma, Guibo Yu, Lijun Cao, Jinhui Zhao, Bing Feng. Decision-making model for ranking battlefield damaged equipment repairs based on multi-criteria. 2013 International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering (QR2MSE), 15-18 July 2013, Emeishan, Sichuan, China: Proc. IEEE, 2013, Vol. II, pp. 1942–1944. — DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/QR2MSE.2013. 6625959.

14. Haikuan Wang, Quan Shi, Fei Xiong, Kan Wang. The application of TOPSIS on sequencing decision-making in equipment battlefield repair. 2013 International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering (QR2MSE), 15-18 July 2013, Emeishan, Sichuan, China: Proc. IEEE, 2013, Vol. II, pp. 1574–1578. – DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/QR2MSE.2013.6625876.

15. Chunliang Chen, Wenhua Shi, Shixin ZhangThe key operation ascertaining of armored equipment parts batch-repair progress for quality monitoring based on FCE. 2013 International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering (QR2MSE), 15-18 July 2013, Emeishan, Sichuan, China: Proc. IEEE, 2013. Vol. II, pp. 1542–1545. – DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/QR2MSE.2013.6625867.

16. Lenkov S.V, Zubarev V.V., Salimov R.M., Protsenko V.A. “Formalization of process of carrying out of repair of components of radio-electronic equipment”, Vіsnik Cherkaskogo derjavnogo tehnologіchnogo unіversitetu, pp. 20–22, 2009.

17. UddE. Application of Fiber Optic Smart Structures // Opt. and Photon News. – 1996. Vol. 7, № 5. – P. 17–22.

18. Senior J. M. Moss S.E., Cusworth S.D. Multiplexing Techniques for Noninterferometric Optical Point-Sensor Networks // Fiber and Integr. Opt. 1998. – Vol. 17, № 1. – P. 3–20.

19. Надійність техніки. Терміни та визначення : ДСТУ 2860–94. – [Чинний від 1995-01-01]. – К. : Держстандарт України, 1995. – 90 с. – (Національний стандарт України).

20. Поповский В.В. Методы априорной оценки сетевой надежности / В.В. Поповский, В.С. Волотка // Радиотехника. – Харьков : ХНУР, 2014. – Вип. № 178. – С. 20–23.

21. Рижаков В.А. Кількісне оцінювання структурної надійності систем зв’язку / В.А. Рижаков, Л.М. Сакович // Зв’язок. – 2004. – № 4. – С. 53–57.

22. Миночкин А.И. Управление топологией мобильной радиосети / А.И. Миночкин, В.А. Романюк // Зв’язок. – 2003. – № 2. – С. 28–33.

23. Вентцель Е.С. Теория вероятностей. – М.: Высшая школа., 2002. – 275 с.

24. Сакович Л.Н. Выбор средств измерений для технического обслуживания и текущего ремонта оборудования систем защиты информации / Л.Н. Сакович, В.А. Рыжаков, В.П. Павлов // Правове, нормативне та метрологічне забезпечення систем захисту інформації в Украіні. – К. : НТУУ “КПІ”, 2003. – Вип. № 7. – С. 77–85.





ISSN 2410-7336 (Online)

ISSN 2311-7249 (Print)