DOI: https://doi.org/10.33099/2311-7249/2019-35-2-71-76

APPLİCATİON OF EXPERT EVALUATİON FOR PROCESSİNG OF RECONNAİSSANCE DATA

Azad Agalar Bayramov, Vugar Mamedguseyn Mamedov

Abstract


In the paper there have been considered a methodology of expert selection uppon the personal characteristics, the survey and processing of expert evaluation results for application of expert evaluation in processing of reconnaissance data. The selection of reconnaissance expert has been offered to carry out taking into account of personal characteristics of experts in this area and to use for evaluation of gotten reconnaissance data during data processing. The method of quantitative processing and calculation of entropy of the results of expert evaluation has been offered. The method of determination of the competence level of reconnaissance groups. The selection of reconnaissance experts taking into account a number of personal characteristics of experts has been offered to carry out upon determination of the factor of quantitative personal characteristics. The characteristics of expert group have been determined based on personal characteristics of separate experts: competence, creativeness and attitude to expert examination, conformism, thinking constructiveness, team spirit and self-criticism. The expert evaluation, which must considered when processing of reconnaissance data, will influence on the level of trustworthiness of these data and, thereby, will provided increasing of effectiveness of the results of reconnaissance data processing. The working model of application of the method of selection of reconnaissance experts based on offered quantitative personal characteristics has been considered. The offered methodology can provide better grounded, objective and qualitative selection of reconnaissance experts.


Keywords


processing of reconnaissance data; expert evaluation; personal characteristic of expert; the result of expert evaluation; entropy of expert evaluation

References


1. Samochvalov Yu.Ya., Naumenko Е.М. Expert’s evalution. Methodological aspect. “Publishing house ДУІКТ”, Kiyev 2007. 294 p.

2. Маyers D. Sosial psychology. SPB: Piterр. 1997. 688 p.

3. Gilford J. Three sides of intellect. Stanford University. «Thinking psychology», Ed. А.М.Маtushkin. – М.: Progress, 1965. – 534 p.

4. Nisievich Yu.А. Compromise and conformism. Publihsing house: «ЛИЦ», М., 2001. 265p.

5. Маlinovski L.G. Model-structural thinking. “Nauka” М., 2003. 656 p.

6. Bugera V. Theory and practics of team spirit. “Nauka”, М., 2002. 137 p.

7. Коvalev P. Self-criticism. Paper https://www.podskazki.info/karta-statej/. 2014.

8. Shannon Е. A Mathematical Theory of Communication.The Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 379–423, 623–656, July, October, 1948.


GOST Style Citations


1. Ю.Я. Самохвалов, Е.М. Науменко. Экспертное оценивание. Методический аспект. “Видаеництво ДУІКТ”, Киев 2007. 294 с.

2. Майерс Д. Социальная психология. СПБ: Питер. 1997. 688 с.

3. Гилфорд Дж. Три стороны интеллекта. Лекция, прочитанная в Стенфордском университете 13 апреля 1959 г. На русском языке опубликована в сборнике переводов «Психология мышления», под редакцией А.М.Матюшкина. – М.: Прогресс, 1965. – 534 с.

4. Ю.А.Нисневич. Компромисс и конформизм. Издательство: «ЛИЦ», Москва 2001. 265с.

5. Малиновский Л.Г. Модельно - конструктивное мышление  Изд.: “Наука” Москва 2003. 656 с.

6. Бугера В. Теория и практика коллективизма. Издательство: “Наука”Москва 2002. 137 с.

7. Ковалев П. Самокритика. Статья https://www.podskazki.info/karta-statej/. 2014.

8.  Shannon Е. A Mathematical Theory of Communication.The Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 379–423, 623–656, July, October, 1948.





ISSN 2410-7336 (Online)

ISSN 2311-7249 (Print)